To meet the growing needs of food for the increasing population, countries should make use of edible insects as food. However, some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but negatively affect nature too. What are the benefits and drawbacks of eating insects?
In today’s world, it is widely perceived that people should ingest edible insect species to meet the demand of food supply for increasing population. Incorporating insects into diet can have some major merits, but there will also be certain demerits.
One evident benefit to embracing insects as food is that it was regarded as a great source of nutritional elements. In fact, bugs could contain up to 80% protein and also be high in energy-rich fat, fiber and micronutrients. For instance, mealworms are particularly nutritious with high vitamin content, loads of healthy minerals and protein, almost as much as in an equivalent amount of beef. Another justification for entomophagy is that it might be a cost-effective solution to a global food crisis. Indeed, insect consumption would slash cultivation costs rather than conventional agriculture practices, thereby improving food insecurity in some developing countries with lower expense.
The disadvantages of making bugs part of our regular diet, however, are indisputable. First of all, safety concerns could not be guaranteed when ingesting insects as it hinders several hazardous problems. In other words, numerous insects feed on decaying matter or arise from poor hygiene, resulting in a variety of bacteria in their bodies. This would therefore make consumers susceptible to foodborne illnesses or allergic hazards when eating insect-derived food. It should be noted that insectivory will upset the natural food chain if humans consume insects with a gigantic quantity. Were people to constantly catch bugs for selling and eating, they would considerably dip in population or even be in danger of extinction, which might disrupt other animals’ food source.
In sum, while bug-eating is beneficial, it is detrimental to ingesting bugs in an improper way.
- To meet the growing needs of food for the increasing population countries should make use of edible insects as food However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but negatively affect nature too What are the benefits and drawbacks of eat 89
- To meet the growing needs of food for the increasing population countries should make use of edible insects as food However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but negatively affect nature too What are the benefits and drawbacks of eat 84
- To meet the growing needs of food for the increasing population countries should make use of edible insects as food However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but negatively affect nature too What are the benefits and drawbacks of eat 84
- Some people think that the detailed criminal description on newspapers and TV has bad influences so this kind of information should be restricted in the media To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'bug'.
Suggestion: bug
...xpense. The disadvantages of making bugs part of our regular diet, however, are ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 589, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[2]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: Where; We
...nsume insects with a gigantic quantity. Were people to constantly catch bugs for sel...
^^^^
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ingest'?
Suggestion: ingest
...ing is beneficial, it is detrimental to ingesting bugs in an improper way.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an improper way" with adverb for "improper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...al, it is detrimental to ingesting bugs in an improper way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in fact, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51601423488 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05694985892 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679715302491 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7696588664 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289282162198 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925981379704 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719836955073 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158821056285 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843919604385 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.