The growing population in the world means we need more food supplies. While some people believe the food problem can be solved by incorporating edible insects into the human food chain, others disagree because they think the demerits of eating insects could be much bolder. In this short essay, I will elaborate advantages and disadvantages of this opinion.
Unlike other species of animals, insects reproduce extremely fast. Not only the reproduction cycle in insects is very short, but also they can lay millions of eggs in a short period. Therefore, it is possible to cultivate them in insects farm for mass production as a potential food source for the future. Besides, they have a substantial amount of proteins, energy and vitamins that can be a decent substitute for other protein sources such as beef, lamb, etc.
Eating insects is against animal rights. However, bugs are not popular animals among people, but they are still animals, and putting them at risk of extinction is against their rights. It has been estimated that more than 1 trillion insects are being killed yearly to compensate for the lack of food supplies. What is more, the way that farmers behave with bugs, and the condition in which they are raising insects, is brutal. Above all, insects are still unknown and eating them might be dangerous for our health. Considering what the whole planet has experienced after starting Covid-19, we must concern about the consequences that eating insects might have.
In conclusion, although the short reproduction time and being a good source of protein makes insects a potential food source, we must consider the risks of eating them and treat them like any other animal. In my opinion, using them as a food source might be inevitable in the future but providing better raising conditions on the farms and seeking other potential food sources like vegetables is the responsibility of all countries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06309148265 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6040163963 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577287066246 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6064634812 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270555457688 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953916095083 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663897350174 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1725151004 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540360635941 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.