Do you agree or disagree?
A person should never make an important decision alone
Some people argue that a person should rely only on himself to make important decisions and choices that affect him. They believe that the only person who knows himself better is not the family members or friends, but himself. However, I disagree with these people and completely agree with the prompt that people should never make important decisions alone. I will support my viewpoint using the following two reasons.
Firstly, when people give their opinions on something, they talk from their experiences and this helps you make an informed choice on the matter. For example, I had received university admits from California State University as well as Boston College when I was applying for a Masters in Computer Science, and I was confused as to which college to select. This was an important decision that would affect my future. I reached out to alums from both universities and asked their take on this situation. Both the alums gave me precious insights into what each college has to offer and the geographical advantages of each university. In the end, I was able to choose a university that was in line with my priorities. The alums’ insights helped me understand what I would gain and lose if I chose any of those universities. This proved to be beneficial for me as I knew what I was getting myself into. Hence, consulting people who have already taken a decision that you are about to take is advantageous as it helps you understand the consequences of your choice better and make an informed decision.
Secondly, when we ask people about their take on something, we interact with them and make them a part of our decision-making process. This networking with like-minded individuals and experts paves way for future opportunities. For instance, in 2006, I was working as a software developer and I wanted to venture into Product management. I was unsure of my decision to leave a well-paying job and look for opportunities in another sector without a job in hand. I approached my manager to get his opinion on this. He suggested I talk to his product manager friends and helped me connect with them. After talking with them, I was sure of my path ahead. One of the experts I connected with offered me a product manager job based on my skills. I understood then that talking with people before making important decisions can open doors that were previously impossible. This example succinctly illustrates the importance of making a decision only after consulting experienced people.
In conclusion, the issue of whether a person should take important decisions alone or by consulting others, remains a complex one. Some people argue that important decisions about oneself should not be influenced by what others think of them. Nevertheless, I still contend that it is beneficial to make important decisions by consulting other people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellow students or co workers than from those at a higher level such as teachers or supervisors 73
- 14 Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason The world today is significantly more complex than it was even in the relatively recent past 50
- As early as the twelfth century a d the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their great houses mas sive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high Archaeologis 73
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclo pedias collections of articles on various subjects What is specific to these online encyclopedias ho 73
- the best way for society to prepare young people for leadership in government or similar fields is through cooperation not competition 33
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 81.0 43.0788530466 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2385.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98953974895 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84841759266 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495815899582 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 753.3 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5859763915 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7307692308 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.19230769231 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276361496262 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075480966901 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917707648371 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19464369732 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089903557716 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, then, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 81.0 43.0788530466 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2385.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98953974895 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84841759266 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495815899582 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 753.3 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5859763915 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7307692308 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.19230769231 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276361496262 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075480966901 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917707648371 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19464369732 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089903557716 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.