tpo21
In these set of materials; the reading passage and the article discuss about the using genetic modification in planting and its effects. The reading passages claims that using the genetically modified trees is really beneficial and provides three reasons in support of the its claim. However, in the lecture, the professor disproves and refutes all three benefits mentioned in the passage.
First, according to the reading passage, genetically modified trees are hardier than nature plants. While, in the article, the professor rejects the reason by explaining that the nature plants are more survival, even though that modified plants might be hardier. She adds that in the nature, with confronting the bad conditions such as climate change, environmental occurrences, or other serious situations, some of the nature plants are destroyed, but some of resistant trees remains sustainable and survival. She cites that on the contrast, the whole of genetically modified plants in face of the same hard condition might be ruined and wiped out.
Second, the reading passage describes that there are great economic benefits for the farmers and persons who grow them up. On the other hand, the professor controverts this reason and restates that there are some hidden costs for the genetic planting, as the seeds are not for free. She declares that the grower should always pay money for the productive companies to get the seeds and plants.
Finally, the article mentions that this way of planting can response the great response of the human populations for the wood and can decrease the overexploitation of wild trees. Nevertheless, in the passage, the professor contradicts this reason by illustrating more the issue that growing the modified trees among the nature ones is more dangerous because they are growing aggressively which damages the nature. She also clarifies that raising them is besides using soil nutrients, water, and other natural sources which finally will have negative effect on the nature tree.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-03-07 | amy2016 | 70 | view |
2022-10-18 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 80 | view |
2022-03-02 | Shahab950 | 3 | view |
2021-08-17 | aaron_105 | 80 | view |
2021-05-29 | m.ramezanii1987@gmail.com | view |
- agree or disagree: It is better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all. 87
- Students at universities often have a choice of places to live. They may choose to live in university dormitories, or they may choose to live in apartments in the community. 80
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 60
- 102 Schools should ask students to evaluate their teachers Do you agree or disagree 72
- Some people believe that success in life come from taking risks or chance. Others believe that success results from careful planning. 80
some of resistant trees remains sustainable
some of resistant trees remain sustainable
this way of planting can response the great response
this way of planting can respond the great response
contradicts this reason by illustrating more the issue that
contradicts this reason by illustrating more about the issue that
Sentence: Finally, the article mentions that this way of planting can response the great response of the human populations for the wood and can decrease the overexploitation of wild trees.
Error: overexploitation Suggestion: over exploitation
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Words: 320 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
-------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 320 250
No. of Characters: 1656 1200
No. of Different Words: 164 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.229 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.175 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.587 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 125 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 98 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 59 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.615 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.475 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.769 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.372 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.607 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.175 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4