Without a question, books are a valuable source of information. They may give in-depth knowledge on a variety of issues and study history, science, and other academic disciplines. Someone may argue that kids can only acquire significant knowledge through reading books, while others maintain that movies may be just as informative as books. I tend to agree with the latter position.
First, movies may be more fascinating than literature. Reading may be tedious at times, as many individuals find it difficult to sit still and read for lengthy periods. Movies, on the other hand, are far more engaging since they are visual and frequently contain action and suspense, which may retain viewers' attention for the duration. Thus, movies can be more remembered than texts, which is advantageous for students, particularly those who must prepare for examinations or papers. For instance, a student is more likely to retain information from a documentary about the Civil Rights Movement than from a history textbook on the same topic. He or she may see what the Great March on Washington looked like, listen to Martin Luther King's address, and experience the fervor of the time. The documentary brings history to life via the use of these images and sounds, an impression that could never be produced by reading texts.
In addition to being more appealing and stunning, films may also cover a great deal of territory in a short amount of time. A normal feature-length film may present a tale from several perspectives that would need hundreds of pages in a book, which is especially advantageous for students with limited time who are attempting to learn about a certain topic. Consider the literary classic "To Kill a Mockingbird." In the novel, Scout, a little girl who observes the trial of a black man accused of raping a white lady, narrates the narrative. The book contains a wealth of information about the individuals and the town, but only through Scout's perspective. In the film version of the novel, the town and its residents are depicted in considerably greater detail. We experience the story's events through the eyes of other individuals, including Atticus Finch, Scout's father, allowing us to observe the story's events from diverse perspectives and to gain a deeper understanding of the characters and their motivations. Without the film adaptation of the book, the audience would not have gained so much knowledge.
Furthermore, most novels and stories have more depth than movies. Of course there are bad books and excellent movies, but usually books contain more than movies. They explain more about the characters and show more details about the action. Part of the reson for this is that most movies have to be close to two hours long. Books, on the other hand, can be as long as the author wants. Readers are more actively involved in a story than movie watchers are. A movie watcher just has to sit and watch. A reader, on the other hand, has to think and imagine. The reader can’t see the scenes like a movie wather can. He has to picture them in his mind and understand what they are about.
In conclusion, much like books, films may be a useful learning tool for pupils.
- Imagine that a professor wants students to learn as much as possible about a subject in a short period of time Is it better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or is it better to require students to work alone Why 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In modern times parents learn more from their children than children learn from their parents 90
- Students can learn as much by watching films as they learn by reading books 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In modern times parents learn more from their children than children learn from their parents 78
- The most important thing the government should do to improve health care is to clean the environment 90
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, still, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2676.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 539.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96474953618 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72578809313 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 212.727598566 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543599257885 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 821.7 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.327298941 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.275862069 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5862068966 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06896551724 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182821418072 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499069493157 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472453394018 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106445396102 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293650025567 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, still, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2676.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 539.0 407.700716846 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96474953618 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72578809313 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 293.0 212.727598566 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543599257885 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 821.7 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.327298941 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.275862069 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5862068966 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06896551724 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182821418072 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499069493157 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472453394018 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106445396102 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293650025567 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.