In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Could this trend have more positive or negative effects on society?
It is apparent that the number of elderly people is growing steadily across many nations. This development is ultimately harmful for two main reasons: putting a strain on the state budget and causing about-force shortages.
Firstly, an older population can put pressure on the country’s budget. Since the elderly are more prone to serious and often costly ailments such as heart diseases and strokes than younger citizens, more funding needs to be allocated to the healthcare system. Consequently, expenditures on other sectors, such as education and defense, will be decreased so as to support the aging population. Little financial resources could adversely impact the significant advancements that could be made in such fields, which would therefore have a negative impact on the country’s socioeconomic development.
Secondly, the increasing number of older people can damage the nation’s workforce. Because elderly people are not as mentally and physically capable as younger people, a majority of them lose the ability to contribute to the country’s economic growth. At the same time, without an adequate number of working-age citizens to replace the aging population, the workforce will be shrunk, further impeding economic development. In the case of blue-collar jobs, a declining labor force can be observed - as workers age, they can no longer perform such physically demanding professions. Hence, they are more likely to be laid off, diminishing the local workforce.
In conclusion, the expanding number of senior citizens is apparently a negative development since it can place a burden on the country’s budget and reduce the productivity of the labor force.
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You sho 84
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic The personal information of many individuals is held by large internet companies and organizations Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- he chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should sp 84
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ducation and defense, will be decreased so as to support the aging population. Little fi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56201550388 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04574721204 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3983356981 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.583333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1817263562 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654432219742 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532450314658 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997053744341 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029869158246 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.