Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, as such relationships good? Why or Why not?
These days, animals, especially domestic animals have become an inevitable part of human life directly and indirectly. Many people have treated their pets with compassion and love as a part of the family. Although there are several disadvantages to raising pets, I still believe that pets can bring various positive impacts on our lives.
On the one hand, there are various reasons explained why domestic animals negatively affect humans. The first reason relates to the potential of spreading some diseases to humans. For instance, some people suffer from allergies when bringing up domestic animals. Also, various cats and dogs do not get enough vaccinated against rabies, which can seriously affect human health if bitten or scratched by them. Furthermore, the cost of bringing up and taking care of a pet is expensive because raising a pet requires many standards such as food, hygiene activities, and fee to cure unpredicted accidents. As a result, it puts a heavy burden on your finances when caring for domestic animals.
On the other hand, I believe that the advantages of the animal-human relationship can help people boost both physical and mentally healthy. Firstly, they can increase opportunities to exercise, get outside, and socialize. Regular walking or playing with pets can decrease blood pressure and cholesterol levels. As a result, you can easily go into the habit of exercising and enjoying a happy time with loyal animals. Nevertheless, animals can manage your emotions such as relieving stress, and depression during difficulties, and obstacles by giving companionship. Some animals, like dogs, are trained to guide and rescue people, which is undoubtedly beneficial to elderlies, and kids because this
can prevent accidents before they happen
To conclude, having a good relationship with animals has both pros and cons. Having a good connection with them is considered a good companionship, stress busters, and loyal.
- Cam 16 test 2 The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 61
- With a growing population many people believe that we should focus on producing more GM foods What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this 78
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- 9 12 2020 20 02 2021 Some people believe that children should do organised activities in their free time while other think that children should be free to do what they want to do in their free time Discuss both view and give your opinion 67
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 100
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, still, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36928104575 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87027280491 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627450980392 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9686968898 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6875 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252119854676 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734047187302 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795841925324 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121951850643 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756672292211 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, still, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36928104575 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87027280491 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627450980392 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9686968898 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.6875 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252119854676 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734047187302 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795841925324 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121951850643 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756672292211 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.