The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and the present day

Essay topics:

The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and the present day.

The two maps give information about the change in the layout of the art gallery on the ground floor between 2015 and the current layout.
In general, most rooms in the east of the gallery remain while the opposite side significantly changes. It can be seen that it is more accessible for the disabled when constructing a ramp for wheelchair and lift.
In the east of the art gallery, three exhibition rooms are staying unchanged. Going through the entrance, the entrance hall, and the receptionist area located in the middle of the ground floor minimize in size. People can go upstairs by stairs or using the lift which is constructed near exhibition room 3.
The exhibition 4 is removed to build the children's area and a small room for temporary display, while the gallery shop and the vending machine are opened in place of a gallery office and a coffee shop. And new disabled access facilities have been added, including a wheelchair ramp at the front of the building.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-18 maiphuonganh 84 view
2023-09-18 maiphuonganh 11 view
2023-09-18 maiphuonganh 11 view
2023-09-18 maiphuonganh 11 view
2023-09-18 maiphuonganh 11 view
Essays by user giangngoc :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76923076923 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63905325444 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603550295858 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3356671792 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190209030201 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076649818863 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108537262863 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128480317151 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129427964122 0.0819641961636 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 806.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76923076923 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63905325444 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603550295858 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3356671792 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.75 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190209030201 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076649818863 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108537262863 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128480317151 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129427964122 0.0819641961636 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.