The table provides information about different sources of income from which the police get their salary, while the pie chart illustrates how that money was spent in one region of Britain, from 2017 to 2018.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the national government was the highest source of income for the police force over the period, while other sources were in the least category. Moreover, most of the money was spent on salaries.
In detail, the national government was the highest source of income, which accounted for 175.5 million in the initial year and increased minimally by around 2 per cent in 2018. Similarly, police officers received 91.2 m of money from local taxes in the year 2017, which increased by nearly 11 per cent in the next year. Moreover, only 38m was from other sources, which remained steady for 2018, which was the least figure among all categories.
Additionally, salaries accounted for 75 per cent in 2017, which was the most popular figure for spending money. that decreased by 6 per cent in the next year. Buildings and transportation were in the lowest category, and the proportion was equal in both years at 17 per cent respectively.
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugarcane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...most popular figure for spending money. that decreased by 6 per cent in the next yea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.915 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54636505631 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9581978227 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.222222222 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226942228306 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979527886382 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113762159595 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164898115855 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14291835355 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.