People have different views on which source of news is the best for newsreaders to obtain information. While it can be argued that learning news via other media is an optimal method to stay informed due to its speedy updates, I would contend that conventional newspapers would be a better choice owing to their reliability and easy usage.
On the one hand, internet-based newspapers would be supremacy to traditional ones in terms of its ability to get updated quickly. More specifically, digital newspapers provide their readers the up-to-the-minute information about current affairs that happen both locally and globally, allowing them to obtain news in a matter of minutes. For example, during the COVID19 period, the news about the infectiousness rates, the ways of protection and prevention from this serious epidemic, and Covid19 vaccinations were updated instantly and constantly on various online platforms and television. On the contrary, those who reading printed newspapers have to wait at least one day or even several days due to the long process of editing and publishing.
Despite the above mentioned, I would contend that paper-based newspapers are by far the most optimal for several reasons. Firstly, traditional news sources provide more reliable information. In reality, newspapers’ content is guaranteed as it is usually scrutinized and thoroughly checked before being published. This helps their readers protect themselves from misleading information, which is frequently rife on the internet. Secondly, those who reading conventional newspapers might find it easy to use. This is because printed news does not require electronic devices as well as internet-connected environment. As result, paper-based newspapers are suitable for all segments of society, even technophobes and those in mountainous regions.
In conclusion, although internet-based newspapers enable their readers to get updated quickly, I believe that printed newspapers are by far the most effective method to obtain news due to its reliability. It is therefore predicted that traditional news channel will still popular in the future.
- The following chart show the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to housing preferences of UK people 87
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 78
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005. 67
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. 73
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, at least, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62732919255 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19895072686 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574534161491 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.522327841 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.8 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193685144797 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600348227409 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494731134585 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130421750565 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677980106423 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.