1. Which area the government should fund to improve children’s education?
a) hiring more teachers to teach in a small class
b) preschool education before kindergarten
c) providing some training courses so that teachers can be more professional
Children are the future of a nation, so the government should shoulder the responsibility to boost children’s education. While some believe that offering teachers some training courses and providing preschool education before kindergarten are good choices, others are more proactive in hiring more teachers to teach in a small class. In my opinion, I agree that the government should fund small-class teaching with more teachers.
First of all, a good student-to-teacher ratio guarantees teachers spend more time on individual students, ensuring higher teaching quality. Children have a lot of problems to be taught, like emotion control, intelligence development, and positive mindsets. Teachers have to spend enough time to put their heart into it, which leads children to be well-rounded people. Drawing from my personal experience, I enrolled at a Beijing’s elementary school with thirty students and three teachers in a class. We could communicate with the teacher in charge of the mental health of children about the puzzles we encountered when dealing with families and friends. We also could ask the academic teacher about the mathematic problems after class. And we could play with the rest of the teacher, learning how to be optimistic from the game failures. Therefore, the government should put money into recruiting more teachers for the attention gained by children.
Secondly, with smaller classes, students can be more involved in group projects and class discussions and thus have the opportunities to develop a variety of skills. In a smaller size class, each group would have a little number of students, like three to five, so that they can more likely to develop communication skills and coping skills during cooperation. For example, a three-people group is discussing a difficult algebra problem. Members would spend a little time introducing the part they don’t understand, and someone who happened to excel in this knowledge would learn to be patient to solve the problems. During this process, children hone the required qualities in communication which are clarity and patience; besides, they also boost their problem-solving skills by helping others unwind from obstacles. By contrast, if such a discussion happens in a group with over ten people, it is more likely that the topic would soon be irrelevant to the study and turns into gossip. So, considering the learning results of smaller classes, the government should invest in them.
Arguably, preschool education before kindergarten prepares children for a solid knowledge system; and providing training courses for teachers keeps them updated with the cutting-edge teaching techniques and theoretical methods. Hence, the educational quality of children would be improved. However, the drawback far outweigh the benefits. Both would pose financial burdens for the government because it requires long-term investment.
In conclusion, due to the well-developing and learning results, I strongly believe that the government should hiring more teachers in a small class to improve the educational quality.
- 1 Which area the government should fund to improve children s education a hiring more teachers to teach in a small class b preschool education before kindergarten c providing some training courses so that teachers can be more professional 90
- 1 Which area the government should fund to improve children s education a hiring more teachers to teach in a small class b preschool education before kindergarten c providing some training courses so that teachers can be more professional 73
- 1 Which area the government should fund to improve children s education a hiring more teachers to teach in a small class b preschool education before kindergarten c providing some training courses so that teachers can be more professional 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 52.1666666667 134% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2631.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55063291139 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01348028 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518987341772 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 771.3 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4121587939 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.391304348 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6086956522 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47826086957 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.470768091136 0.236089414692 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12768562386 0.076458572812 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121698961537 0.0737576698707 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303708858548 0.150856017488 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15975602168 0.0645574589148 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 10.9000537634 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.