That an increasing number of houses are built is necessary in many nations to deal with overpopulation. While the building of more houses in existing areas is beneficial, I believe that constructing new towns in rural ares is of more vital significance.
The first reason why I strongly support the project of erecting new towns in the countryside is that there are lots of land being unexploited. Those land plots are mainly used for agriculture production. If newly-developed towns emerge in the rural, more people will aim at these valuable living places which offer them not only healthier living conditions but also state-of-the-art equipment. As a result, there will be an equal distribution of the population rate in a nation.
Another reason for this is that more job opportunities will open up for rural residents. The appearance of more facilities means that more recruitments are made, allowing rural people to apply for a job with lucrative income and without worries about commuting fees. This can recover unemployment rate in the rural areas and retain highly-qualified and industrious workers. For example, rural-based woodland exploitation in Quang Binh province to build a town has successfully proved in creating great job chances for the local. Therefore, more residents can make earnings there, which can deal with overpopulation in a certain place.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I maintain that new towns should be erected in rural areas. It is advisable that governments take the initiative to have more housing projects in the rural.
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- Nowadays it is not only large companies that can make films Digital technology enables anyone to produce films Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 73
- WRITING TASK 1You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an increasing number of houses are built is necessary in many nations to deal wit...
^^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'facilities'' or 'facility's'?
Suggestion: facilities'; facility's
...rural residents. The appearance of more facilities means that more recruitments are made, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oitation in Quang Binh province to build a town has successfully proved in creati...
^^
Line 5, column 637, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with overpopulation in a certain place. In conclusion, for the reasons I have me...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26771653543 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14583435555 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610236220472 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9306082063 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.923076923 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343240390047 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115084859473 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847684456831 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229204463289 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105734442261 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.