The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country betwwwn 1999 to 2004
The given diagram depicts information regarding the amount of fish and various kinds of meat consumed in a particular European nation during the 1979-2004 period.
Overall, there was a substantial decline in the consumption of beef and lamb, while a significant rise was obviously seen in chicken consumption. In addition, fish consumption had the lowest figure throughout the period examined.
Regarding chicken, its initial amount was nearly 150 grams in1979, after which it experienced a considerable increase in 2004, registering precisely 250 grams.
In view of beef, the weekly consumption started at 140 grams, then it witnessed a dramatic drop from 1984 to 2004, sinking to a trough of 125 grams in the 1999-2004 period.
Exactly 150 grams was the amount of lamb that an European consumed each week in 1979. Afterward, it moved in parallel with that of beef, then basically halving in 1999 which recorded 75 grams.
The figure for fish underwent negligible movements that remained roughly the same at 50 grams.
- Nowadays more and more people use online shopping Some people think it is a good development To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country betwwwn 1999 to 2004 78
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
- The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2005 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country betwwwn 1999 to 2004 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 47, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...y 150 grams was the amount of lamb that an European consumed each week in 1979. Af...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41463414634 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82034442102 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0276676357 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184559768006 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772694326677 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503384117862 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893771671009 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509109977542 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.