These days, many schools and universities let students do some group projects, and all members of the group receive the same grade on it. I disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students. I will tell you three reasons to support my opinion.
First, if they get the same score, they will have a friend who will suffer. As we can see from dramas and movies, if they do group projects, they will have a friend who does nothing and friends who do everything alone. Therefore, it is unfair to give the same score to them. It is unfair to give the same score just because they are on the same team because students are justified in getting a score as they try. In fact, one of my classmates did not contact me and participate at all, but we got the same score, so that time, I was so angry.
Second, it will lose purpose. The main purpose of the group project is to achieve harmony and cooperation with each other, but in reality, the majority are fighting, angry, and intimidating. So, rather than teamwork, it seems like there is a division of teams or one person leads them all. I think this way is difficult to implement because it does not even achieve its purpose.
Last, it is so unfair if everyone gets the same score with a low score. The score is a sensitive part of many students. High school students are very important for their scores. Therefore, many students pay a lot of attention to getting a score cut, but if they get a low score because of teamwork, they will feel more sad then when they did not do well in the test.
Of course, there are advantages, but it is a task that bothers students every time. That is why it is an evaluation method that needs to be improved.
The reading and the lecture are both about solar energy. The author of the reading passage tells some benefits of solar energy. On the other hand, the lecturer explained both sides of solar energy.
According to the reading, solar energy can reduce fossil fuels. The article mentions that people use fossil fuels that are limited very quickly, so renewable solar energy can be a good substance. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that when we produce solar energy we should use fossil fuels.
Additionally, he points out that in five years, solar energy uses more than it produces.
Secondly, the author suggests solar energy has no pollution. In the article notes that fossil fuels produce a large amount of pollutant, but solar energy produces zero harmful byproducts.The lecturer, additionally asserts that multiple uses of solar energy. He goes on to say that solar energy is private so people can waste money and energy.
Finally, the author puts forth the idea that solar energy has a low cost. The author contends that the lifespan of a solar panel is thirty years, so it can be used longer and cheaper than others. Also,the lecturer’s stance is the financial benefit of solar energy. He says that solar energy can be cheaper with use for multiple consumers.
- Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would be impossible. First, atmospheric 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Boys and girls should attend separate schools Use specific reasons and examples to support you answer 50
- Young people make decisions based on their parents. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The private car has brought more harm than benefits to the planet Use reasons and specific examples to support your opinion 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Boys and girls should attend separate schools Use specific reasons and examples to support you answer
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 14, column 324, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...se of teamwork, they will feel more sad then when they did not do well in the test. ...
^^^^
Line 31, column 188, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...energy produces zero harmful byproducts.The lecturer, additionally asserts that mul...
^^^
Line 34, column 201, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...sed longer and cheaper than others. Also,the lecturer’s stance is the financial bene...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, i think, in fact, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2543.0 1977.66487455 129% => OK
No of words: 541.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70055452865 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82280071112 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41023212797 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469500924214 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 798.3 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7685802425 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0606060606 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3939393939 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69696969697 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.53405017921 221% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20753259846 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556390066573 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115684333145 0.0737576698707 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927785214712 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168509274447 0.0645574589148 261% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.