In the future, there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries. Is it a positive or negative effects.
The share of senior citizens is anticipated to be greater than that of younger people in many nations. In my view, this trend is both desirable and unfavourable in equal measure.
A higher proportion of older people than younger ones should be viewed as a change for the better. For one, they play an essential part in society. The rich wisdom and knowledge they have accumulated throughout their lives make them suitable for taking important decisions, resolving conflicts and many other life circumstances. Were it not for them, many families would probably face serious financial mismanagement or divorce due to disagreements and conflicts. We should also not overlook their role in child upbringing. In many countries, they are in charge of raising their grandchildren, so it is an excellent assistance for families where both parents work. I for example spent a large part of my childhood with my grandparents, since my parents were at work, and my grandfather taught me such valuable life lessons as codes of conduct, the importance of respect and the value of education.
Nevertheless, a larger number of the elderly than younger individuals can be a cause for concern. This means a reduction in the amount of taxes, for there will be fewer working adults. In effect, the economic development of a country might be impeded markedly, because taxes make up the majority of the government budget. This trend will also likely engender a burden on healthcare systems. This is because the more people age, the more vulnerable they tend to be to various illnesses. The past COVID-19 pandemic illustrated how difficult it was to cope with geriatrics in such countries as Spain and Italy, where there is a large proportion of older citizens.
In conclusion, while having more elderly people than younger individuals can be advantageous for social and family reasons, it might, at the same time, bring about economic and medical challenges. Therefore, I am of the opinion that this change is both beneficial and detrimental.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 56 | view |
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 61
- Some people think that government should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activities Discuss both views and give your opinions 61
- Some people think that government should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activities Discuss both views and give your opinions 61
- In conclusion despite the potential benefits of using social media the drawbacks involved are of greater significance 78
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 899, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of respect and the value of education. Nevertheless, a larger number of the eld...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment budget. This trend will also likely engender a burden on healthcare systems....
^^
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... The past COVID-19 pandemic illustrated how difficult it was to cope with geriat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11746987952 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9313450472 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581325301205 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7530148081 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9411764706 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231487824504 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735369831477 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842026977711 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145285536822 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481046035193 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 899, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of respect and the value of education. Nevertheless, a larger number of the eld...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment budget. This trend will also likely engender a burden on healthcare systems....
^^
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... The past COVID-19 pandemic illustrated how difficult it was to cope with geriat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11746987952 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9313450472 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581325301205 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7530148081 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9411764706 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5294117647 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231487824504 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735369831477 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842026977711 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145285536822 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481046035193 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.