The golden frog
The article and the lecturer are both about The golden frog.While the article's author proposes some techniques that can be used to protect the frogs from the fungus effection, the lecturer in the listening passage opposes these methods. She believe that these wayes are ineffective.
First, the reading starts by stating that we can use a special bacteria to protect the frogs skin. The professor, however, disagrees. She poins out that the affict of these bacteria is temprary thus, it will not last for a long time.
Second, the artice also discusses that we can move the frogs into another place. The lecturer is doubtful that this is correct. She mentions that even is we moved them, there still other animals that hold the same fungus.So when frogs contact with them, the will be infected by the fungus.
Finally, the writer holds that frogs sometimes can protect themselve naturaly by controlling their temprature and rise it up.On the other hand, the professor thinks that there are flaws in the author's argument. She states that Although this way is effective, it cost a lot of frogs energy. As a result, some of them can die.
- taxes on cigarettes and unhealthy food 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- what you will choose work alone or with your classmates 60
- do people pay a lot of money for their look 60
- what you will choose work alone or with your classmates 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...lecturer are both about The golden frog.While the articles author proposes some techn...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...ning passage opposes these methods. She believe that these wayes are ineffective. F...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'bacterium'?
Suggestion: bacterium
...ts by stating that we can use a special bacteria to protect the frogs skin. The professo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...other animals that hold the same fungus.So when frogs contact with them, the will ...
^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...rolling their temprature and rise it up.On the other hand, the professor thinks th...
^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ssor thinks that there are flaws in the authors argument. She states that Although this...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, second, so, still, thus, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 1373.03311258 69% => OK
No of words: 194.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90721649485 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3646032878 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603092783505 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 67.2977840314 49.2860985944 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5454545455 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256455466363 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755466901557 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841128439509 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14516598289 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640111878047 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: While
...lecturer are both about The golden frog.While the articles author proposes some techn...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...ning passage opposes these methods. She believe that these wayes are ineffective. F...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'bacterium'?
Suggestion: bacterium
...ts by stating that we can use a special bacteria to protect the frogs skin. The professo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...other animals that hold the same fungus.So when frogs contact with them, the will ...
^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...rolling their temprature and rise it up.On the other hand, the professor thinks th...
^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ssor thinks that there are flaws in the authors argument. She states that Although this...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, second, so, still, thus, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 1373.03311258 69% => OK
No of words: 194.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90721649485 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3646032878 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603092783505 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 67.2977840314 49.2860985944 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5454545455 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6363636364 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256455466363 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755466901557 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841128439509 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14516598289 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640111878047 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.