People living in the 21st century have a better life quality than people who lived in previous times.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There has been a belief that the life quality of the 21st century is much better than that of previous times. In my opinion, I believe that due to the development of technology and civilization today, our life is improved in numerous ways.
On the one hand, life in the previous times saw outrageous wars and the revolution of society. Therefore, citizens in the past had faced lots of difficulties and had gone through many revolutionary protests to survive in such an unsafe world and return the world to its peaceful days. In comparison with today’s convenience, people didn’t have the Internet for entertainment and education or they didn’t have as many transportation and appliances in the past years as in the Industry 4.0 world. People lived without what we consider “commonplace” in today’s world, thus, in the past, the rates of illiteracy and famine were increasingly high. Moreover, a few decades ago, wars still occurred and threatened citizens’ lives. People lacked food, education, transportation and convenient equipment and the economy was in its primitive and undeveloped era. Therefore, life quality turned out to be poor in comparison with that of the 21st.
On the other hand, in the 21st century, our life quality has entered a new chapter of life, it becomes more and more modernized and civilized. Contrary to those difficulties in the past, people, today can apply technology in education and medication to improve the productivity of these 2 categories. Online courses and distance learning help students study at every place, at any time. Moreover, technology provides a wide amount of information to support students’ educational careers. Medication used to lack specialized equipment supporting specific diseases, therefore, it was not as well-equipped as that today. Special appliances have been invented to save thousands of lives from death. Also, the economy now sees a fluctuation, which means our life is getting better every day. Thus, the rates of illiteracy and death decrease significantly compared to those in the past. The life quality in today’s world surpasses the quality in the past in every category.
In conclusion, life quality in the 21st supplies people with the convenience, they have been craving, thus, the quality of past life can not surpass that of today.
- Modern technology has greatly influenced people s ways of entertainment making people less creative Do you agree or disagree 61
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about energy consumption in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below compares the number of people per household by percentage in the UK in 1981 and 2001 73
- In some countries today many people decide to have their first child when they are older What are the reasons Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...turn the world to its peaceful days. In comparison with today’s convenience, people didn’t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to help'
Suggestion: to help
...s. Online courses and distance learning help students study at every place, at any t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1960.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24064171123 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02486194955 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53743315508 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7492828993 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.157894737 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257224183232 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766646804703 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770887500993 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177290638787 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348769178023 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.