It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
Supplying the university sites for an elevated percentage of youthful individuals has remained a debatable topic in recent years. I completely disagree that this issue is not only impossible but also is not useful to execute.
On the one hand, the above problem will be very possible if the governments use the superfluous lands to build universities. This also give the assistance for the young people who are looking forward to finding more appropriate studying places after fulfilling the graduating examinations. For instance in India, they have been using the owner less ground to build more colleges for decades and can be capable of satisfying the high amount of adults at the same time. But to make it successfully both the government and the citizen must have the same opinions to each other through the sensible policies.
On the other hand, there are more convincing reasons why I believe that it is productive for the topic I am discussing about. Firstly, utilising the unnecessary and unused places will decrease significantly the desolate locations. Secondly, this can give the students a hand to let them cultivate more helpful and essential knowledge for their careers afterwards. To show the evidence for this, still in India, a few universities require the points too high to get in, nevertheless there are many options for them to choose the college which are proper to their potential. Thus, the useful side of it is undeniable.
In conclusion, even though the issue above still not particular around the world but the possible and helpful aspects are conspicuous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-29 | Nyahmeo | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 67 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10769230769 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84749448675 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0038192621 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191707907409 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625606220358 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346929502632 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101059693148 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040953498404 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.