The chart illustrates average CO2 emissions per person in four European countries between 1975 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph gives information about how much CO2 was emitted in each other in 4 different cities in European over 30 years from 1975 to 2015.
What stands out from the graph is that there were 2 opposite trends for these 4 figures. While the amount of CO2 production in Spain and Greece witnessed a progress, CO2 released in France and Norway reduced over the same period.
Starting at a quite high point, CO2 emissions in France reached a peak at nearly 12 metric tons in 1975, but later it continued to decline moderately by more than 8 tons in 2015. regarding Norway, humans emitting CO2 was 10 tons after experiencing a slight climb from 1975 to 1985, but then it started to drop considerably around 6 tons in the last year of the century.
On the other hand, there was a growth of 4 tons in the amount of CO2 emissions in Spain in 1975, but then it was continued by an improvement to about 8 metric tons in 2015. the similar trend was true for Greece city, starting at approximately 2 tons, the figure for CO2 release increased significantly to reach at the same point in Norway until 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2020-06-04 | gisellanathania | 83 | view |
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 78
- The chart below shows the annual rice production in 4 countries in 1995 2005 2015 73
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Regarding
...moderately by more than 8 tons in 2015. regarding Norway, humans emitting CO2 was 10 tons...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ovement to about 8 metric tons in 2015. the similar trend was true for Greece city,...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46534653465 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51272616204 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564356435644 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.4251099474 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.857142857 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8571428571 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127050463991 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643763644063 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396920297494 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0860836164815 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314613054492 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.24 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.