The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030

The line graph show energy consumption by fuel type in the United States from 1980-2008, with projections until 2030.
Overall, petrol and oil; coal and natural gas have been the popular fuels have the higest quadrillion. Nuclear and renewable energy sources have a small represent but significant proportion of total energy use and small projected gains.
Petrol and Oil command the biggest share with 35 quadrillion units in 1980, rising near to 40 quadrillion in 2008 and this trend is continued project value of nearly 50 in 2030. In 1980 natural gas and coal get to second and third, with around 16 and 20. However, coal overtake natural gas in 1990 and inspite of some fluctuation, it is the second most used fuel in 2030 with just over 30. It is predicted that natural gas will stop at remain relatively about 25. Nuclear and the renewable energies all represented around 4 in 1980 and fluctuated up until 2008. It is think that nuclear energy will reach 10q by 2030 and solar/wind around 5, with hydropower dropping and then remaining near 2 quadrillion.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'thought'.
Suggestion: thought
...80 and fluctuated up until 2008. It is think that nuclear energy will reach 10q by 2...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h hydropower dropping and then remaining near 2 quadrillion.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, then, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86263736264 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58877519962 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8259153661 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282022785233 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124348891061 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120733844657 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235455175642 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154482570018 0.0819641961636 188% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.