It is argued that increasing the minimum age for drivers is the most effective measure to enhance the safety on the roads. While this approach can potentially reduce the number of roads accidents, I maintain that imposing stricter punishments for traffic offenses and upgrading public transportation would be feasible solutions to address the root causes of traffic accidents.
Undoubtedly, raising the minimum age requirement for vehicle drivers can reduce the number of road collisions. In reality, young drivers who may lack experience and maturity are more likely to engage in reckless and dangerous driving behaviors, putting themselves and other commuters in danger. Requiring individuals to wait until they are older to obtain a formal driver’s license can encourage them to operate their vehicles more responsibly and cautiously, which contributes to a safer and more secure driving environment. For example, in some countries, such as Japan or South Korea, where the minimum age for drivers is high, have lower rates of traffic accidents involving young people.
However, increasing the age of legal eligibility for drivers does not fullly address the underlying causes of traffic collisions. Moreover, it is critical to note that traffic accidents can stem from various factors, including careless driving behaviors or poor transport infrastructure, not solely from young drivers. Thus, stricter penalties for traffic offenses, such as heavy fines or longer license suspensions for repeat offenders. Additionally, the government should invest the national budget in public transportation improvement, including providing more bus and train services to encourage citizens to rely less on private vehicles, ultimately leading to fewer road accidents. The Mass Rapid Transit System in Singapore , for instance, has significnatly reduced the number of private cars by enforcing strict laws and penalties for traffic-based accidents, along with a well-established subway and bus system.
In conclusion, although raising the minimum age for drivers can improve road safety by limiting traffic collisions, it is vital to solve the underlying causes of road-based accidents through severe punishments for traffic offenses and upgrades to public transport. I am also convinced that once these measures are implemented, road users will obey these regulations, creating safety conditions for all drivers.
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 73
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 78
- The diagram below shows the production of ethanol oil from grain Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The chart below shows the spending in million dollars per household in the US on five different products in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 729, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e Mass Rapid Transit System in Singapore , for instance, has significnatly reduced...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75070028011 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02843411508 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591036414566 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.3688912096 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.923076923 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4615384615 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191962119673 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809495446689 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606091352875 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127974757323 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132830165169 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 729, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e Mass Rapid Transit System in Singapore , for instance, has significnatly reduced...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2053.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75070028011 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02843411508 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591036414566 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.3688912096 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.923076923 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4615384615 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191962119673 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809495446689 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606091352875 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127974757323 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132830165169 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.