The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.
Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie chart illustrates how many percentage of the main manners transport which used by people going to one university between 2004 and 2009.
What stands out from the pie chart is that while the proportion for Car have the downward trends, other transports improved. In addition, Train which is the least used means of transport in both two years.
In 2004, starting at more than a half, Car was the highest before it witnessing a significant tumble to accounted for 28% in 2009. Ranked second in 2004 was Bus with 32% and then, the percentage overtook Car to become largest over 5 years, at 46%.
Besides, Bicyce which responsibility for around less than one in ten, after the proportion progressing to take up 16% of the pie chart at the same time. The percentage of Walking experienced a slight growth during two years with 4% and 6% respectively. Similarly, Train consituted 3% in 2004, but the figures just rose to comprise 4%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-02-26 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh 56
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 73
- The most important function of music is that it helps people reduce stress To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun percentage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many percentages'.
Suggestion: many percentages
The given pie chart illustrates how many percentage of the main manners transport which use...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'become the largest'.
Suggestion: become the largest
...nd then, the percentage overtook Car to become largest over 5 years, at 46%. Besides, Bicyce...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, second, similarly, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76219512195 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.683113907 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658536585366 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1100435656 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.625 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159498230943 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655780872553 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799328964152 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109452055209 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942803548412 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.