n increasing number of advertisement on TV aim at children. What are the effects of television advertisement? SHould televison advertisements be controlled?
With the development of advanced technology, companies easily advertise their products which mainly target children on television. This tendency can bring various extreme influences on health and the economy, and I still believe that the authorities should take actions to deal with this problem.
There are various reasons why advertisements bring adverse influences on children. The first reason relates to unreliable information and unethical business, advertisements only concentrate on the themes of fun and fantasy or tasty, rather than health and nutrition, which promote children. The advertised diet contrasts sharply with that recommended by public health advisers. As a result, children may suffer from obesity if they overcome food and drink which contain high levels of fat and sugar. The more food adverts they saw, the more snacks and calories they consumed. Furthermore, advertisements influence children's preferences and purchase behavior. Because they are not taught that things cost money, or money needs to be earned. It accidentally puts too much pressure on parents to meet all their needs.
Both governments and parents should tightly control advertisements to solve the issues. Firstly, the authority should ban strict regulations to restrict the ads for cigarettes and alcoholic drinks in children's programs. In addition, parents encourage kids to play outdoor activities such as football or make new friends in lieu of having a sedentary lifestyle to reduce watching time.
To sum up, because television advertisements have a wide range of harm to children, they should be closely controlled by the government.
- The diagrams below show a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007 78
- The picture below shows the differences in the layout of conference center in 2010 and 2025 61
- The table show the frequency of visits to networking sites by teenagers in a country in 2010 78
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 100
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, still, in addition, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62096774194 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98386006973 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677419354839 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2002639853 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5714285714 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280637668436 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101114741847 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917984965367 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179486580792 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070035250133 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.