The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps illustrate how Grange Park has been changed from the opening in 1920 to the present.
As can be seen from the pictures, the park has been dramatically transformed after the construction of several facilities over the given period.
In 1920, visitors could enter the park from the northern lane on Arnold avenue or southern lane on Eldon street, but today they can enter through the underground car park. There was a pond for watering plants on the northern corner. In the southeast corner was a space for a glass house. Not only was there a large fountain in the middle of the park, but also there were two rose gardens to the north and south of the stage. Besides, a stage for musicians has also been erected on the left-hand side of the entrance from the north.
At the moment, the two entrances are still remained at the top and bottom, but there is a new entrance near a water feature for an underground park. The glass house was demolished to make way for the water feature in the bottom right corner. In the top right corner, a café has been built on the original site of the rose garden. There is a play area for children next to the café. The most significant change is in the centre of the park, where the fountain has been knocked down and replaced by a new rose garden with seats around it. On the left-hand side of the Grange park, a concert amphitheatre has been constructed to replace the stage for musicians.
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Plan A below shows the ground floor of a particular art gallery in 2005 Plan B shows the same area in the present day 73
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 73
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The graph below shows the average retirement age of males and females in six countries in 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1185.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50570342205 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38765105507 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51711026616 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 357.3 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2735405382 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1538461538 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.53846153846 7.06120827912 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143041984824 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505635899962 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467557255408 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963301056393 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289813066027 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 12.4159519038 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 78.4519038076 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.