The advantages brought the spread of English as a global language will outweigh the disadvantages. Tow what extent do you agree or disagree with this view ?
Almost no country avoid being swayed by the trend of globalization, under its subtle influence, the multiplication in business transactions and culture communication. This essay will examine both sides of the arguments before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of spread of English as a global language. First, English subsidies for education are believed to equalize educational opportunities among young adolescents regardless of their background. This spread English support, presumably, tends not only to increase the overall college enrollment rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority and expand world relations between nations, which eventually promotes an egalitarian society. Second, spread English as a global language would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problem would be far more significant than the minor benefits once spread English as a global language. First, all people using English as a second language would likely correspond with a tremendous diploma strain on a country. Generating no income from school tuition and fees because all people want to learning English, universities that require English degrees cause invisible pressure on students, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as the healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, spread English as a global language would tempt many young people including those who are not academically inclined or show no interest among in English pursuits, thereby adding great burdens for university admissions and enrollment staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent pursuing more suitable career paths. It, instead, would be a more language viable option if the resources were focused on supporting education and basic communication does not place emphasis on degrees.
In conclusion, in modern life, English become an important parts. Personally, I hold positive attitude towards increased cooperation in terms of globalization economic matters and cultural exchange, however, we also should be alert to the potential risk of this trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-17 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
- The best way for a government to prepare for the future is to invest in young people To what extent you agree or disagree 89
- While many people go to university for academic study more people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers Do you agree or disagree 89
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in household in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- Some people think that being able to communicate with others online is breaking down geographical barriers and enabling people who would normally never have the chance to meet to communicate What are the advantages of international communication online Ar 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households owning four types of electronic devices between 1995 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 60, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'part'?
Suggestion: part
...odern life, English become an important parts. Personally, I hold positive attitude t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2066.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75487465181 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01407431459 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657381615599 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.8493202445 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.571428571 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6428571429 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173450792351 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631921510447 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041909261748 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939574002308 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381426113537 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.55 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.