One of my personal values insists that wrong information needs to be put right, even if it takes time since not anything can be corrected right away. If my teacher or meeting leader makes some mistakes in their speech, I will choose to closely discuss with them after the meeting ends.
It should be noted that one of the most important factors in effective communication is to not make the other person look bad in front of a crowd. If I am being straight-forward and correct my teacher or class president right at the spot, the first thing that comes to their mind will probably not about my suggestion for correcting, but other students' judgement on their mistake. This is an absolutely normal psychological reaction in human beings. Furthermore, the meeting leader may covertly misunderstand my friendly help as an evil attempt to humiliate them in front of others. This can easily ruin our relationship if the misinterpretation is not talked through. Therefore, it is always more beneficial for both sides to talk about the false information in private, after the other people have gone away.
Another reason why we should point out the mistake to the teacher or leader instead of being ignorant is to show that we listen and we are responsible for making things right. If a major mistake happens and no one asks for correction, it can unexpectedly cause troubles that no one can think of. For example, there was a piece of school festival announcement that everyone in my class had known before, so no one was seemed to be listening during the meeting. However, there was a girl that had been absent for a couple weeks and was listening to the news for the first time at the class meeting, where the information was being wrongly given. After class, I went to meet with the class president and asked for a confirmation about the date. If it hadn't been for this correction, that girl could have missed the school's festival due to receiving the wrong information. This rule of mistake correction applies to other things in life too.
In conclusion, it's equally important for me to avoid making my teacher or meeting leader lose face in front of others and to make sure accurate information is provided after wrong one have been given out in a class meeting. Hence, I choose to talk with them when everyone else has gone instead of correcting them immediately or staying silent. I believe this option will benefit all of us as a whole.
- TOEFL T P O 2 Integrated Writing Task 52
- TPO 62 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement After completing high school students should take at least a year off to work or travel before they begin studying at a university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- TPO 47 Integrated Writing Task 90
- TPO 55 Writing Integrated Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A n 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...my suggestion for correcting, but other students judgement on their mistake. This is an ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 749, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...or a confirmation about the date. If it hadnt been for this correction, that girl cou...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 813, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...ection, that girl could have missed the schools festival due to receiving the wrong inf...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74647887324 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70809826344 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516431924883 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3884742934 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122015790785 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425635870187 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466360399118 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945090555286 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443708402855 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.