The diagram illustrates the proportion of news readers using four different forms of mass media from 1995 to 2025. It is clear from the data that there is an uptrend in the percentage of Internet users, whereas TV, radio, and newspaper keep decreasing significantly
TV was the most popular form of updating news for people in 1995, reaching to 68%. During the same period, there were roughly 55% of users of newspapers and radio, while no one uses the Internet to read the news. After a decade, the proportion of Internet users rose slightly to 3% and then continued increasing until the year 2025. There is a downward trend in the others form of updated information. In terms of newspaper and radio, the percentage declined constantly to approximately 30%. The proportion of TV users fluctuated from the first 15 years, then it is predicted to fall by 20%.
In conclusion, the Internet is expected to be the most popular form of updating news in 2025, while the others form keep decreasing.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or a shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later Some say that these are the best people to talk to school students about the dangers of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do agree or disagree 11
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 56
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honor kindness and trust no longer seem important 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, whereas, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85380116959 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72934696183 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0896750891 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17945877281 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776595802818 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056903015347 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132676575713 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00760494287588 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.