The bar chart below shows shares of expenditure for five major categories in the US, Canada, the UK, and Japan in the year 2009
The bar graph compares the percentages of consumers spending on food, housing, transportation, healthcare and clothing in four distinct countries in 2--9
Overall, consumers in these countries spent the most money on housing, food and transportation, whereas healthcare and clothing accounted for the smallest proportion.
In 2009, the US expenditure on housing was highest, at about 26%, compared to the lower figure for the British, with 24%. The figures for Canadian and Japanese residents were almost the same, at about 22% and 23% respectively,. In contrast, 23% of Japanese citizens spent money on food, followed by 20% of the British, 14% of Canadians and 13% of Americans. The proportion of spending on transportation was significantly higher in Canada, at 20%, than any of the other countries.
Turning to the other categories, American residents spent 7% of the total expenditures on healthcare, while this figure was 3% lower in Canada, and Japan, and followed by only 2% in Japan. However, there were no significant differences in the proportions of buyers in these countries spending on clothing, around 4% to 6%.
- While some people consider global warming to be the most pressing environmental problem which we have at the moment others believe that deforestation has a more devastating impact on our world Discuss both sides and give your opinion 89
- Some people say that news has no connection with almost people s lives and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspapers and watch TV news Do you agree and disagree Pls help me to check this essay Thanks a lot 73
- Despite a large number of gyms a sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in the contemporary world What problems are associated with this What solutions can you suggest Please help me to check this essay Thanks a lot 67
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., with 24%. The figures for Canadian and Japanese residents were almost the same,...
^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... same, at about 22% and 23% respectively,. In contrast, 23% of Japanese citizens s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31284916201 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18343611093 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564245810056 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0539150969 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.857142857 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120640027569 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545158445651 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533122297059 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0645698775915 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031290073683 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., with 24%. The figures for Canadian and Japanese residents were almost the same,...
^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... same, at about 22% and 23% respectively,. In contrast, 23% of Japanese citizens s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31284916201 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18343611093 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564245810056 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0539150969 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.857142857 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120640027569 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545158445651 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533122297059 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0645698775915 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031290073683 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.