The best way to solve world's environmental problem is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental problems are one of the most pressing issues that the world faces today. Climate change, pollution, and resource depletion are just some of the many challenges that our planet is struggling with. As such, various measures have been proposed to address these issues, including increasing the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. In this essay, I will argue that while raising fuel prices can be an effective solution, it is not the best way to solve the world's environmental problems.
On the one hand, increasing fuel prices can help reduce the demand for cars and other vehicles, which can decrease carbon emissions and lower pollution levels. There are many hidden costs associated with consuming oil, such as the health impact of air pollution, damage to natural resources and ecosystems, and the long-term effects of climate change. This can encourage people to use public transportation, ride-sharing, or carpooling instead of driving their cars. This approach would result in less fuel consumption, which would ultimately lead to lower greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, raising the cost of fuel can be a useful tool in managing the world's environmental problems.
On the other hand, raising fuel prices can also have negative economic effects on middle-class and low-income families. These groups are more likely to rely on their vehicles for their daily commute and other necessities. As such, raising the cost of fuel could increase their financial burden, making it difficult for them to meet their basic needs. Furthermore, it could also cause inflation in prices due to increased transportation costs, which could lead to other social problems that would impact the very same people who were hit hardest by the initial price increases. Instead, governments should consider complementary policies and strategies that would address the root causes of these problems. For example, they can invest in renewable energy sources, encourage the adoption of electric or hybrid cars, promote sustainable agriculture, and implement stricter regulations on companies that pollute the environment. Such measures can bring about more comprehensive and sustainable solutions.
In conclusion, while raising the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles can be an effective way to address environmental issues, it is not the best solution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | tsln7607 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | Anhhhhhh | 78 | view |
- Companies use different ways to increase sales What different ways do companies use to increase sales What is the most effective 67
- Some people think young people should follow the traditions of their society Others think that they should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- While people in developing countries are happier than in the past people in developed countries are less happy Why What can be learnt from this 78
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think it is happening How to solve this issue 11
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lution, and resource depletion are just some of the many challenges that our planet is stru...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 534, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'hit the hardest'.
Suggestion: hit the hardest
...ld impact the very same people who were hit hardest by the initial price increases. Instead...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44686648501 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87841355133 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550408719346 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5124944713 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.588235294 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282010297926 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930264527061 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855222799746 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220732658103 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796954768062 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.