Topic: technology, has developed rapidly in the last century. Do you think its development is slowing now? Why or why not?
In spite of thriving drastically in the era of technology, it is argued that the speed of its prospect is experiencing a downward trend in the foreseeable future. From my perspective, I contend that cutting-edge technology would continue comprehensive growth with the aim of curbing certain limitations currently.
One major ground behind the reason why many people believe that technology innovation is experiencing a slow increase is the misunderstanding of its potential exploration. Although it cannot deny that advanced technology has sprouted across the world, becoming ubiquitous in many areas, residents utilize it on a daily basis, they do not have a well-rounded understanding of its thriving progress. Indeed, they just make use of state-of-the-art technology achievements and entirely ignore doing research about them. Therefore, they often hold a belief that technology is all about solving problems and facilitating daily activities. Nevertheless, every novel technological advancement is likely to become a viable solution for several long-standing issues. Thus, it makes sense that our current wave of technological advancement is an exponential aspect to conduct research holistically.
In addition, if citizens spend time researching technological advancement, they would acknowledge that scientists are applying groundbreaking technological expansion in academic fields, including producing music by writing complicated codes, specialized tools for surgery, and content marketing. To give an example, these days, chat GPT has become a top-of-mind topic, which raised numerous concerns as well as doubts about being replaced by artificial intelligence in the foreseeable future. This is because, this tool can learn rapidly, and generate abundant ideas at the fingertips such as writing content and designing a vivid infographic. If it makes a mistake, it could realize and remember in order to not stumble into the same mistake next time. As can be seen, its operation has enhanced certain limitations of previous applications.
In conclusion, although technological development is probably considered in the stage of slow transformation, I strongly believe that it still prospects considerately in the next decade due to the demand of humans as well as its potential aspects that can be explored in-depth. Therefore, humans should reset expectations, redouble research efforts, and start looking into new territory for technological expansion.
- Topic The chart below shows the percentages of five kinds of magazines sold by a company in the UK between 2001 and 2009 89
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative development 78
- The diagrams show how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled 78
- Some people say that it is the responsibility of individuals to save money for their own care after they retire To what extent do you agree or disagree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 73
- Some people think that we should divide students based on their academic ability while others think we should educate all students together Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 889, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...spect to conduct research holistically. In addition, if citizens spend time rese...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85872576177 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43436015726 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8567375545 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169625975115 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481059106218 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424346160196 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884188295315 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444248810667 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.38 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.