The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities.
"Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our warehouse in Palm City, but last month we discovered that over $20,000 worth of food there had been destroyed by pest damage. Meanwhile, the Buzzoff Pest Control Company, which we have used for many years in Palm City, continued to service our warehouse in Wintervale, and last month only $10,000 worth of the food stored there had been destroyed by pest damage. Even though the price charged by Fly-Away is considerably lower, our best means of saving money is to return to Buzzoff for all our pest control services."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The vice president reaches the conclusion that their food company must sign contracts for pest control only with Buzzoff, while cancelling those that were made with Fly-Away. This conclusion is based on the premise that the warehouse at Palm City managed by Fly-Away incurred more significant amounts of damage as compared to the Wintervale warehouse managed by Buzzoff. However, in making their argument, the vice president fails to answer three important questions, the answers to which could dramatically affect the veracity of their logic.
First, are the conditions at the two warehouses similar, i.e., were factors such as climate the same across the two locations? A related question is: Was the crop stored in Palm City one that was more susceptible to pests or other external factors, as compared to that of Wintervale? It may be the case that Palm City was much more humid in the past month, or that Fly-Away was not given access to the warehouse in time for them to clear the pests. The argument does not provide further evidence of pests being the reason for the damages, beyond simply stating it. If there were other causes that led to the damages being higher at the Palm City Warehouse that were outside the control of Fly-Away, then the recommendation proves unwarranted. If the climate of Palm City was unfavourable, or if the food stored there was improperly packaged, Fly-Away would not be responsible for the role that such factors would play in rapidly growing pest populations. To assume that the two locations are functionally equivalent is foolish without the provision of further evidence in this regard.
Second, would Buzzoff be able to work in both the warehouses at the same time? In other words, if the contract with Fly-Away was to be thrown out, then would Buzzoff’s services be sufficient in minimizing damages, as the vice president claims? It is possible that Buzzoff is a small family-managed company with it having about 10 to 15 people working for it, and it is also possible that the warehouse managed by Buzzoff was substantially smaller than the one in Palm City, making it easier for them to deal with. If any of these possibilities are found to be true, then Fly-Away may, in fact, be better equipped at handling pests at their assigned warehouse as compared to Buzzoff. The vice president must answer this question with full certainty, since making an immediate decision could even lead to catastrophic situations, like the possible exacerbation of pest populations in the Palm City location.
Third, was Fly-Away able to save more money than Buzzoff in potential losses due to pests during the last month? It is possible that Fly-Away was able to avoid around $30,000 worth of damages, bringing down losses by 75%. The argument provides no explanation for how Buzzoff could have reduced the losses of $20,000 to a lower number. What if the amount of food stored at Palm City and Wintervale were worth $100,000 and $11,000 respectively? In this case, Buzzoff could only retain a thousand dollars’ worth of food items, while the Palm City warehouse fared much better. Thus, by not providing information related to the exact proportion of losses incurred at the two locations, the vice president does not make his case persuasive enough, and hence does not warrant the enforcement of the recommendation drafted in the memo.
In conclusion, the argument, as it stands now, is considerably flawed. Its inability to answer the abovementioned questions stems from multiple unstated assumptions that the vice president has made, with a high potential for losses getting worse, in case the plan to switch fully to Buzzoff’s services is executed. They have assumed that the raw numbers are themselves significant enough to make the argument convincing, and that these are reasonable indicators for the efficacy of the pest control companies working at the two warehouses. A comprehensive study must be done by the food distribution company to choose the right way forward, and the argument needs an overhaul, with substantiative evidence to back up all of its claims.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 | Technoblade | 63 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | abidek001 | 63 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | 宋致遠 | 82 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | HSNDEK | 68 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | abhikhanna | 70 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 80
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a listener supported public radio station For the past year as part of an effort to broaden our supporter base our Folk on the Air program has allocated less time to traditional American folk musi 68
- Nowadays there are a large number of coffee shops and fast food vendors on high streets and in town centres Why are there so many of these outlets What effect is this having on the society 84
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 77
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positi 70
Comments
e-rater score report
The second argument is not correct
============================
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 680 350
No. of Characters: 3347 1500
No. of Different Words: 292 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 5.107 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.922 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.706 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 232 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 183 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 127 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 79 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.2 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.709 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.295 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.483 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.065 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, then, third, thus, while, as to, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 19.6327345309 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 13.6137724551 132% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 28.8173652695 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 99.0 55.5748502994 178% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3436.0 2260.96107784 152% => OK
No of words: 679.0 441.139720559 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06038291605 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.10466731938 4.56307096286 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78069849382 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 308.0 204.123752495 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453608247423 0.468620217663 97% => OK
syllable_count: 1059.3 705.55239521 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 2.70958083832 369% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.67365269461 358% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.22255489022 308% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 19.7664670659 126% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.8473053892 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7634225101 57.8364921388 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.44 119.503703932 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.16 23.324526521 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.70786347227 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 6.88822355289 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333791448332 0.218282227539 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959095460752 0.0743258471296 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07058137749 0.0701772020484 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208957836334 0.128457276422 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560501179984 0.0628817314937 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.3799401198 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.3550499002 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.197005988 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 98.500998004 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.1389221557 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.