The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities.
"Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our fast-food warehouse in Palm City, but last month we discovered that over $20,000 worth of foud there had been destroyed by pest damage Meanwhile, the Buzzoff Pest Control Company, which we have used for many years continued to service our warehouse in Wintervale, and last month only $10,000 worth of the food stored there had been destroyed by pest damage. Even though the price charged by Fly Away is considerably lower our best means of saving money is to return to Buzzoff for all our pest control services."
The vice president of the a food distribution company with food storage in several cities made a claim that the pest control service offered by one of their pest control company has less damage than the other in different cities. And the best means for is fot them to return to the buzzoff for all their pest control service. This assumption is based on unjustifiable ground in which there some questions need to be answer.
First of all, the warehouse capacity in the palm city and wintervale need to account for, this will proof and evidence based on the quantity of food item in the warehouse. The vice president need to answer the question the varieties of foods their customers are demanding for that are presently in their warehouse. However, this will give an insight of the price range before such assumption could be made by the vice president.
Secondly, the charges by fly-away pest control company that is relatively high compare to buzzoff pest control company need some questions to be answer. The location of the company the where they are carrying out the services required by the fast food may be the variation in their price of service. Nevertheless, vice president assume the best means is to return to lesser price for pest control. Based on this assumption by the president there is need to provide a grounding evidence about the standard of operation in the both cities involve before the conclusion can me made. This may be as result of cost of materials needed to carry out pest control service in Palm city is relatively high than that of wintervale.
Furthermore, the disturbance of pest in palm city may vary significantly compare to that of wintervale. The vice president need to provide a solid evidence on the statistical analysis of the ranges of pest in both cities. And, there is need to make a clear indication of where the warehouse is located whether is a pest attracted area on not. So, if the vice president provide an information about this and answer question, this will give a clear incation based on the vice president assumption.
Finally, the cost that each companies involved spent on their services like staff benefit before or after the service need to be evaluated. When answer is provide to this question, then, the vice president assumption may be the best option for the company.
In conclusion ,the vice president made a claim of their loss compare to both companies involved in pest control to opt for the less loss services could be a best means, however, some questions need a justifiable answer by the vice president.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-18 | Technoblade | 63 | view |
| 2023-05-29 | abidek001 | 63 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | 宋致遠 | 82 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | HSNDEK | 68 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | abhikhanna | 70 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities Recently we signed a contract with the Fly Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our fast food w 63
- Government should offer college and university education free of charge to all student 66
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 443 350
No. of Characters: 2093 1500
No. of Different Words: 160 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.588 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.725 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.555 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 138 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 115 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 74 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 53 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.611 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.251 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.611 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.377 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.599 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.098 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
The vice president of the a food distribution company with food sto...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are demanding for that are presently in their warehouse. However, this will give...
^^
Line 6, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t option for the company. In conclusion ,the vice president made a claim of their...
^^
Line 6, column 156, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...opt for the less loss services could be a best means, however, some questions nee...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.9520958084 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 28.8173652695 83% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 55.5748502994 130% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 2260.96107784 95% => OK
No of words: 443.0 441.139720559 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82618510158 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62868343688 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 204.123752495 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.381489841986 0.468620217663 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 705.55239521 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0738569944 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.777777778 119.503703932 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6111111111 23.324526521 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.70786347227 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329498416886 0.218282227539 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120321497742 0.0743258471296 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109819223346 0.0701772020484 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197709259839 0.128457276422 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104365112993 0.0628817314937 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.3799401198 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.3550499002 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 98.500998004 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.