It is unequivocal that traveling is beneficial when recent decades have witnessed a substantial increase in tourists. Tourism's outstanding strengths are that we diversify our horizons and maintain the balance between family and work, which will be clarified in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, there is no denying that trips to new places help us enrich our understanding of the world. It is obvious that there are numerous tourist hotspots for one person to find out. For this reason, commuting to new sites where we can encounter locals having different religions, lifestyles, and cultures is a boost to promoting our social knowledge. For example, Western countries tourists always have a thirst for traveling to Eastern parts of the world, particularly Viet Nam owing to the fact that they are immersed in cultural beauties through special foods and hospitable lifestyles and they can explore how Vietnamese lead their lives.
Last but not least, it is widely acknowledged that work-life balance is amongst the most outstanding perks of traveling. In this ever-changing society, assuming a high volume of work seems to be an inevitable thing to keep up with changes in quality of life, which is conducive to weakened bonds between members of the family. Therefore, we should take trips for the whole family with a view to bringing them together. Research conducted in Japan specified that Japanese white - collars those who have to spend up to 14 hours per day working are gradually distant from their families; thus, they now
want to go far away from their homes with their families to recreate former bonds and work more efficiently. This is a compelling testament to maintenance between family and work thanks to traveling.
To sum up, the upsides of traveling are reasonable with regard to both diversification of visions and work-life balance.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22185430464 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85109931994 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635761589404 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.1396919646 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.416666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0615239242848 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0258643772246 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467180481259 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0468112413963 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452326046793 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.