The table illustrates the number of citizens in New Zealand between 2011 and 2012 by 5 different age groups.
What stands out from the graph is that the population of all age groups slightly increased from 2011 to 2012, however, there was a minimal decrease in the number of groups under 15 and 15-39. Besides that, 15-39 was always the highest figure in 5 different groups.
Looking at the graph for more details, the number of citizens of all ages reached 4,381,269 in 2011 then small progress to 4,410,284 was witnessed in the number of that in 2012 and 0,6% was the percentage changed during a year. Similarly, 0,6% also was a change in the 40-64 group, and this group climbed up from 1,331,907 to 1339,898 and it stood the second place in 5 different groups. Moreover, the group of 65+ also rose moderately but was still lower than that of the 2 above groups, by 0,4%.
On the other hand, under 15 and 15-39 age groups were the two groups that had a slight drop during the period shown by 0,2%. Nevertheless, after changing, 15-39 was still the highest figure in 2012 with 1,574,102 while the population of under 15 just made up a half as low as a group under 15 with 896,364 at the same time.
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The table shows data about what people in the UK thought the government should increase spending on 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam Write at least 150 words 73
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The table illustrates the number of citi...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...11 and 2012 by 5 different age groups. What stands out from the graph is tha...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... highest figure in 5 different groups. Looking at the graph for more details,...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n that of the 2 above groups, by 0,4%. On the other hand, under 15 and 15-39 ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, similarly, so, still, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53424657534 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33928148369 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534246575342 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2269847791 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.125 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.375 5.23603664747 294% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243836718884 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121541204086 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102790645302 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18529134598 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847492594687 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.