The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided maps depict the evolution of the central library's layout and arrangement over a span of twenty years.
A comprehensive contrast between the present design and that of two decades ago reveals a significant transformation. Commencing at the entrance and progressing towards the library's core, noticeable changes have occurred. Tables and chairs have been eliminated, resulting in a more open space. The current library configuration has repositioned the area for adult fiction books from the left side to the right, introducing an information desk and self-service machine. The former location of adult fiction has now been repurposed to house reference books. On the left side near the entrance, the reading room has been replaced by a computer room. Opposite this, where an enquiry desk once stood, now sits a cafeteria. The cafeteria's layout is noticeably squarer compared to its previous form.
The final area of transformation pertains to the children's zone. The corner that formerly accommodated the children's book room is now designated for lectures. This section has been shifted to the opposite corner, adjacent to the lecture room. Furthermore, the children's area has been slightly expanded to accommodate various activities, with a specific focus on storytelling events. The availability of two sofas enhances the comfort for children, while the content provided for them predominantly revolves around fiction.
In summary, the comparison of these maps underscores the substantial changes undergone by the central library's arrangement. Notable shifts in areas such as adult fiction, computer rooms, and children's spaces indicate a purposeful evolution to cater to modern needs and preferences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | 123456abcxyz | 11 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | 123456abcxyz | 11 | view |
| 2024-05-11 | Tường Vân | 11 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 723, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cafeterias'' or 'cafeteria's'?
Suggestion: cafeterias'; cafeteria's
...k once stood, now sits a cafeteria. The cafeterias layout is noticeably squarer compared t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...rmation pertains to the childrens zone. The corner that formerly accommodated the c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 965.302439024 152% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64230769231 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08031303642 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 106.607317073 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619230769231 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 283.868780488 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1606684282 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6875 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9375 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0684110887813 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0220259339807 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0244217606125 0.0843802449381 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0394486642144 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221676061797 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.06136585366 126% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 40.7170731707 231% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.