The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual ’ income in 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates how many households in the America depended on their annual' income in 3 years (2007, 2011, 2015).
Overall, the figure of all 5 categories increased steadily in the final year 2015. In addition, the group of lowest income took the least figure while the group of $100,000 millions or more was the highest data all of the period.
From 2007 to 2011, it can be evident that the number of the two groups that income less than $25,000 and $25,000-49,999 were steady growth, started at exactly 25% and approximately 27% to around 30%. Opposite change can be seen in the group of $100,000 or more, which decreased from nearly 30% to about 27%.
The amount of the lowest income' group was declined marginally to roughly 26% in 2015. The figure of the secondly lower income group had a similar change, but greater extent, about 28%. On the other hand, the data of the household's group which earned more than or $100,000 was jumped rapidly in the final year, reached at approximately 35%. Throughout 3 years, the middle income's group about $50,000-$74,999 had no significant change, levelled off around 20%.
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the lowest'.
Suggestion: of the lowest
...final year 2015. In addition, the group of lowest income took the least figure while the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...0 millions or more was the highest data all of the period. From 2007 to 2011, it can be e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76165803109 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42182395755 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585492227979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3363896518 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13019708157 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660173481222 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819409739392 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111740416146 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101441376395 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the lowest'.
Suggestion: of the lowest
...final year 2015. In addition, the group of lowest income took the least figure while the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...0 millions or more was the highest data all of the period. From 2007 to 2011, it can be e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76165803109 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42182395755 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585492227979 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3363896518 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13019708157 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660173481222 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819409739392 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111740416146 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101441376395 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.