The line graph provides information regarding the smoking rate per 1000 people in a certain region from 1960 to 2000.
Overall, the smoking rates among men in this region have generally decreased, while conversely, the prevalence of smoking among women has shown an upward trend.
In 1960, the number of men who smoked stood at 600 per 1000 people, whereas for women, it was just over 100 per 1000 people. However, by 1970, there was a slight increase in the number of women smokers, reaching around 200, while the number of men smokers decreased slightly to 570.
By 1975, the number of women smokers had surpassed 300, an increase of 100, while men saw a decline of about 70, bringing their number down to approximately 500.
In 1980, the smoking rate among women remained relatively stable, but the number of male smokers continued to decline, dropping to just over 480. Subsequently, the trend continued with women experiencing a slight decline, reaching around 290 in 1990 and 200 in 2000.
For men, the smoking rate in 1995 was slightly over 290 and further decreased to 250 by 2000.
- In some countries celebrities complain about the way the media publicize their private lives Some people say that they should accept it as part of their fame To what extent 56
- The bar chart shows expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 different areas 70
- The bar chart shows expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 different areas 84
- The bar chart shows expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 different areas
- The table below gives information about students studying in six departments in an Australian university in 2011
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, regarding, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90909090909 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47520230296 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55614973262 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.2321840342 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.75 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250417515096 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133481020711 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156387319422 0.0843802449381 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159299609626 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163276460278 0.0819641961636 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.