Space exploration is a controversial topic. Some people believe that resources should be invested in exploring space, while others argue that this money could be better spent on more pressing problems on Earth, such as poverty and climate change. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, the question that whether nations should allocate budget to research about other planets has become a contentious topic. Whilst it has been argued by some that this investment is valuable, others hold the thought that it is better to spend money on more ugent issues. Both points of view have rational reasons which will be elaborated on in this essay but personally I agree with the later assertion.
On the one hand, there are good grounds to argue that findings from space investigation could brings significant benefits in terms of human life and economy. First and foremost, it might open a promising new environement for people in case the life on Earth will fall into extinction in the future. Indeed, since the Earth’s habitat in recent years has become more and more hostile with detrimental climate changes threatenning the human life, looking for a new planet to live may be an effective solution that should be considered. In addition, should researches on outer planets be conducted, valuable minerals, such as gold, titanium, and so on, having high economic value might be discovered. As a result, instead of exploiting the Earth for natural resources, people can take the advantage of other sources from the space to serve the economy.
On the other hand, I believe that it is better for national authorities, to put their priority on other more pressing problems, especially poverty and climate change. Firstly, in most developing and undeveloped countries, it is indisputable that the government cannot help all citizens to have good life quality let alone spending money on space researches. For instance, in Africa, it has been witnessed that a huge amount of people cannot access basic needs for life and well education so budget should be used to address this problem. Secondly, decades has been withnessed that global climate changes have impact negatively on the Earth’s life while finding a new planet to live is not an easy way but costs a fortune and takes a lot of time. Therefore, to solve this problem immediately, the government should implement policies to heal the Earth such as investing on alternative energy sources and planting trees.
In conclusion, although researches on universe comes up with certain benefits, it is only should be invested by wealth nations while national money should be taken for other more important issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the average daily sales of selected food items at the Brisk Caf by season Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some countries people are having children at later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantage outweigh disadvantages 84
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...findings from space investigation could brings significant benefits in terms of human ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10230179028 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69651829993 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.2867595632 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 142.5 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9285714286 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363512262034 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115203675521 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493666273078 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218219910019 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199427008467 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.