1. Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.
The discussion on how a school curriculum should be structured has long been a subject of interest and debate. In fact, it is not a mundane one among school teachers to contemplate on what is beneficial to their student. What knowledge will interest them and increase their assimilation. Many argue that astute syllabus should covert an interest of the student so as to encourage them and build their self-esteem subconsciously on the topic. However, from a polemical point of view, other argue that it’s best to include only thing that are only crucial to the mental development and career excellent. The assumption of this prompt recommend that academia should add on their syllabus what the student want in other to improve their performance in that field. I strongly agree with this suggestion that interest of the students should be put into considerations when developing a school curriculum for two reasons.
To begin, scientific hypothesis are complex, the one that demand intrinsic and in-depth know out, looking for an angle before one can comprehend. To make their topic more comprehensible, it’s advisable to always relate these unfamiliar concept to things of interest. For instance, the big bang theory are seen by many as an incomprehensible theory on the development of the world. The one that require years of study displeasing theory that are not easy to comprehend, consequently, aiding the difficult terms. However, if this theory can be related to familiar things for student, this complicated theory that is unseemly to comprehend can be easily understand. For example relating it to how a football can burst on a field without giving a sign of symptom of such. This can let the student have better understand of this complicated concept. The above example illustrate that complex hypothesis can be make know and understandable to student if they are related to things they are familiar with.
Further, research has shown that people perform better when carrying out activity they love. This mean that student will be more successful in their study when teach what they love. For instance, an article released by Prof. John of john in 1975, discover that there has been an improvement in the performance of student after the introduction of extra curriculum activities that are related to their field. This above examples show that this extra curriculum activities allow them to be able to relate unfamiliar science concepts to their day to day activities.
Of course, one will argue that how can we teach student what they need to know at a given period of time, if we are including ‘unnecessary’ activities in their curriculum. However, studies has shown that reading a verisimilitude book that with stimulate our competence level to the concepts. Isn’t that the reason why the school should include those thing of interest to improve how their student comprehending those concept. By doing this it make the work easier for the student and the teachers for it will reduce the number of time the teacher will take to explain such concept. Therefore, it’s expedite for interest of the student to be put into consideration for student better understanding of complex concept.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-27 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-27 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-27 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-27 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-27 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
- 1 Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them 62
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time 62
- 1 Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...hould covert an interest of the student so as to encourage them and build their self-est...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...udent what they need to know at a given period of time, if we are including ‘unnecessary’ acti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 345, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this thing' or 'those things'?
Suggestion: this thing; those things
...he reason why the school should include those thing of interest to improve how their studen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 412, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this concept' or 'those concepts'?
Suggestion: this concept; those concepts
...improve how their student comprehending those concept. By doing this it make the work easier ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 444, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...hending those concept. By doing this it make the work easier for the student and the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, look, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in fact, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 63.0 33.0505617978 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2689.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1219047619 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89959822066 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453333333333 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 825.3 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4943821513 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.56 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18857110605 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590755728774 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470754750524 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131309005245 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690123228109 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 362, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...hould covert an interest of the student so as to encourage them and build their self-est...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...udent what they need to know at a given period of time, if we are including ‘unnecessary’ acti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 345, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this thing' or 'those things'?
Suggestion: this thing; those things
...he reason why the school should include those thing of interest to improve how their studen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 412, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this concept' or 'those concepts'?
Suggestion: this concept; those concepts
...improve how their student comprehending those concept. By doing this it make the work easier ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 444, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...hending those concept. By doing this it make the work easier for the student and the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, look, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in fact, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 63.0 33.0505617978 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2689.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 525.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1219047619 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78673985869 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89959822066 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453333333333 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 825.3 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4943821513 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.56 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18857110605 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590755728774 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470754750524 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131309005245 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690123228109 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.