The figure given above describes the budget of the English police department in one area during the years 2017 and 2018. It is noticeable that more than half of the money contributed to the police budget came from the national government. A significant amount of that money is used to pay officers and staff.
As the table illustrates, the total amount that was donated to the police department increased by about 14 million pounds within a year. Local taxes accounted for nearly 90 percent of this raise, which is about 10 million pounds. There was also an increase in the contribution of the national government, from 175.5 million in 2017 to 177.8 million in 2018. Other sources witnessed a slight rise, about 500.000 pounds, during the period mentioned.
Regarding the money distribution, the bar chart shows that in 2017, police officers and staff earned nearly 228 million pounds, which accounted for 75 percent of the total money. This figure dropped by 69% (about 224 million pounds) in 2018. Nevertheless, the proportion of the budget spent on buildings and transport stayed stable at 17% in both years. Meanwhile, technology consumed about 20 million pounds (8%) in 2017 and doubled it in 2018 (14%).
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reason for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 67
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 61
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97524752475 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5991230527 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574257425743 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5429655817 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3636363636 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243928569909 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846234361003 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671404798221 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166414680924 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465805808365 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.