The given line graph illustrates the data on the amount of energy consumed bt the USA commuters over the period of 50 years, from 1980 to 2030.
It is clear that the USA relies primarily on fussil fuel power both in the past and in the future.
In 1980, petrol and oil enegy was consumed the most, at 35 quadrillion units and this figure continue rising significantly, in the year 2030, it is expected to climb by 47 quadrillion units.
Meanwhile, the amount of coal and natural gas ranked the second and third among six sources mentioned with 16 quadrillion units and 20 quadrillion units respectively in 1980. From 1980 to 2015, these figures fluctuated slightly between 16 quadrillion and 25 quadrillion units. However, during the priod from 2015 to 2030, natural gas consumption will stay unchanged at 25 quadrillion units, whereas the amount of coal consumed will considerably increase to 30 quadrillion units.
Turning to the other sources, three of them started with 4 quadrillion units in 1980 but differently change in the next 50 years. The consumption of nuclear power slightly increase, reach about 8 quadrillion units in 2030, while the figures for solar and wind power consumption vary from 4 to 5 quadrillion units. By contrast, hydropower uasage slightly fluctuated until 2010, from that the amount of this energy consumed remain completely unchanged.
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 81
- Influence of human beings on the world 039 s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio diversity What are the primary causes of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 61
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the inforamtion by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0796460177 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82507483976 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553097345133 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9849076732 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.555555556 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129307366685 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639208546732 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356375798479 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0806944746958 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475585277809 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.