TPO-14
The reading states that there are several reasons why salvage logging in beneficial both to a damaged forest and to the economy and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor says that salvage logging can result in serious longer term environmental damage and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading states that the salvage logging removes the remains trees and makes room for fresh growth immediately. Therefore help forest areas recover from the disaster. The professor refutes this point by stating that cleaning up the forest after the damage not necessarily create the right condition for trees growth because the natural decomposition of trees that felled down can enriches the soil with nutrients. Moreover, the rapid removal of these trees can result in soil that lacks the nutrient that necessarily for trees growth.
Second, the passage posits that the salvage logging contributes the health of the forest, by removing rotting wood could help minimize the dangers of insect infestation such as the spruce bark beetle. In contrast, the professor says that it‘s true that rotting wood can increase the insect population, but it is not bad for the forest. Spruce bark beetles have lived in the forest for hundred years without causing any major damage. Therefore, the salvage logging may cause harmful effects on the forest than insect do.
Third, the reading claims that the salvage logging has economic benefits; the trees that have been damaged by natural disasters still can provide much wood that is usable by industries. Moreover, salvage logging helps create additional jobs for local residents. The professor refutes this point by explaining that the economic benefits salvage logging are small and do not last for a long time. Also, salvage logging process needs expensive vehicles such as helicopter. Furthermore, jobs created by salvage logging are fitted by outsiders with more training than
- Tpo27-Integrated writing 80
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 70
- choosing a college or university 81
- TPO28-Integrated writing 90
- TPO-14 60
Comments
can you help me with the
can you help me with the rules? can you rewrite the second and the third errors please?
thank you.
If noun2 belongs to noun1,
If noun2 belongs to noun1, then don't put them parallel like:
noun1 + noun2
you may use:
'noun1 of noun2'
or noun1's noun2
the salvage logging removes the remains trees
the salvage logging removes the remains of trees
for trees growth
for the tree's growth
why salvage logging in beneficial both to a damaged forest
why salvage logging is beneficial both to a damaged forest
Sentence: First, the reading states that the salvage logging removes the remains trees and makes room for fresh growth immediately.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to remains and trees
Sentence: The professor refutes this point by stating that cleaning up the forest after the damage not necessarily create the right condition for trees growth because the natural decomposition of trees that felled down can enriches the soil with nutrients.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to trees and growth
Sentence: Moreover, the rapid removal of these trees can result in soil that lacks the nutrient that necessarily for trees growth.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to trees and growth
because the natural decomposition of trees that felled down can enriches the soil
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
by removing rotting wood could help minimize the dangers
by removing rotting woods, it could help minimize the dangers
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Words: 309 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 19 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 12
No. of Words: 309 250
No. of Characters: 1604 1200
No. of Different Words: 160 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.193 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.191 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.341 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 134 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 101 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 44 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.6 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.663 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.733 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.375 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.581 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.101 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4