The graphs show changes in the trends of the urban and rural population and by different age groups from 1950 to 2040.
Given is the lines chart depiciting the changes in the direction of 2 different figures Rurals and urbans population by different ages group commencing from 1950 to 2020 and predection to 2040.
It is perceptible that the total and urban proportion had an escalation in a period from 1950 to 2020 before increased slower in the 2030 and 2040. Meanwhile, the ages from 15 to 65 are on top of the Trends in age structure while there was no disproportion in the ages of under 15 and over 65 .
In the figure of rurals and urban population trends, there was a development in the total population from 10 percents at 1950 to around 36 percents in 2020 and predicted to go up 43% in the next 20 years. In 1950, the rural and urban are stayed at around 8% and 5% respectively nevertheless in the next period from 1960 to 2020, the urban are augmented by 13 % and predicted to around 37,5% in 2040 while the opposite is likely to be true with the rural areas with no disproportion in the first year of the period with the prediction in 2040.
Following by the percentage of people in 3 different age. In the first year, the age of 15 to 65 are remained at 6% while the over 65 and under 15 are 3% and 3,1% respectively. In the next period from 1960 to 2020 , are an insingnificant in the over 65 and under 15 before stood at 5% in the prediction year of 2040. Strikingly, the age of 15 to 65 are on the top with an maximization by 25% from 1960 and 2020. This figure also had reach to around 35% in the prediction years.
- The map shows how coastal land develops into a coastal park 78
- In developing countries children in rural communities have less access to education Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Inte 89
- The diagrams show a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 67
- The graph below gives information about daily salt intake in the USA in 2000 67
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... direction of 2 different figures Rurals and urbans population by different ages ...
^^
Line 2, column 293, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tion in the ages of under 15 and over 65 . In the figure of rurals and urban po...
^^
Line 6, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t year, the age of 15 to 65 are remained at 6% while the over 65 and under 15 are...
^^
Line 6, column 216, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y. In the next period from 1960 to 2020 , are an insingnificant in the over 65 an...
^^
Line 6, column 372, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...the age of 15 to 65 are on the top with an maximization by 25% from 1960 and 2020....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 33.7804878049 225% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 287.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.28571428571 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6688407705 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.414634146341 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.4193774194 43.030603864 180% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352243606825 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152576531259 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129681415481 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267912794795 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141614842733 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.