Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others. What types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages?
Some people think the preservation of certain old buildings should be prioritized more than others. Although some types of buildings should be preserved because of their importance and impact, I believe that its disadvantages outweigh its advantages for several reasons.
Due to their significant impact, some types of old buildings need to be protected. The first type is the buildings that embody cultural and historical values because they represent a country’s identity and history of development. The second type of old buildings is those that represent unique architectural styles, which have the potential to attract tourists. A notable example of these buildings is the Imperial Citadel of Thang Long, a tourist attraction in Hanoi that holds significant historical values.
Preserving old buildings can have both advantages and disadvantages. Firstly, these buildings can be educational sources for students to learn about their country’s history since they were one of the remnants of the past. Secondly, these ancient attractions can positively contribute to a country’s economy by increasing tourism revenues. Hoa Lo Prison Relic, for instance, is a famous tourist attraction in Hanoi, attracting both foreign tourists and local students.
Despite the impact on education and tourism development preserving old buildings has, the disadvantages matter more. First, the restoration of these buildings can be expensive, especially for developing countries. To renovate the old architecture without ruining the ancient appearance, contractors need suitable materials. However, these materials are often expensive since they have become rare and might need to be imported from overseas. This could cause difficulties for developing countries not to exceed the estimated budget for old building reconstruction. Moreover, reconstructing old buildings can affect urban aesthetics as it takes a long time to completely improve the damaged conditions. Once urban aesthetics are ruined, tourism cannot thrive due to visitors losing interest in places full of ongoing constructions.
In conclusion, old buildings that represent cultures, history and improve an economy through their revenues deserve to be restored. However, the drawbacks of cost and urban aesthetics outweigh the benefits.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use
- The chart below compares the number of people per household by percentage in the UK in 1981 and 2001 73
- Some people think that good health is a basic human need so medical services should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The table gives statistics showing the aspects of quality of life in five countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- People nowadays sleep less than they used to in the past What do you think is the reason behind it What are the effects on individuals and people around them 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86607142857 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11421466489 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568452380952 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3859065882 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.736842105 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6842105263 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457887840777 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156332373548 0.084324248473 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15777126558 0.0667982634062 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286732249245 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.173079308946 0.056905535591 304% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.47 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1971.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86607142857 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11421466489 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568452380952 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3859065882 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.736842105 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6842105263 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.457887840777 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156332373548 0.084324248473 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15777126558 0.0667982634062 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286732249245 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.173079308946 0.056905535591 304% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.47 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.