The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005.
The following graph illustrates the proportion of administration’s investment on infrastructure and transportation of 4 distinct countries from 1990 to 2005.
Overall, there was a decrease in the figure of Italia, Portugal, and the UK, while the USA witnessed an increase. However, the Portugal had the highest figures in the period.
The Portuguese figure started at the peak of larger than 25 percents in 1990, but later had a continuing drop to 20 percents in the last year of the period examined. However, the percentage of the USA started at approximately 11 percents, after which it experienced a small decline to 10 percents in 1995, before ending the period at 15 percents in 2005. Especially, the Portugal and the UK remained the same positions throughout the period, which were the highest and the lowest percentages.
The similar trend of changes can be seen in the figures for the Italia and the UK, which fluctuated and reached a peak in 2000. Meanwhile, the figures for the Portugal and the USA saw opposite changes, including the increase of the USA and the adversed trend of the Portugal, albeit the first-ranked percentage of the Portugal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-04 | Sang Sang Sang | 80 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | chau hoang | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | minh phương phạm hồng | 67 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words You should sp 70
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09730785881 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8031099322 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112788170509 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465840559406 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540429912099 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723536332465 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624238515656 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.