The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university.
The diagram gives information about the rate of pupils who calculated the high score for separate factors at one university during the years 2000, 2005, and 2010. Overall, electronic resources surged dramatically; meanwhile, a substantial decrease in the range of modules offered occurred in these years.
On the one hand, the percentage of learners who rated high points for electronic resources was approximately 45% in 2000, and then it soared sharply up to 72% and 88% in 2005 and 2010, respectively. Besides that, teaching quality was also one of the factors, which was responded well by students, increasing from 65% to 69% in 2000 and 2010 accordingly.
On the other hand, some categories, like buildings/teaching facilities, and print resources, maintained stability for good votes during the three years; even if the rate of the learners changed, it only fluctuated 1% to 2% slightly. The range of modules offered changed during these years of surveys. In 2000, the rate of pupils for the category was very low at only about 32%; however, by 2005 and 2010, this declined more steeply by about 30% to 27%, consequently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
- he maps below give information about a school in 2004 and the change of the same school in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university 78
- The pie charts below present information about what the UK graduates did after leaving university in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The pie charts below present information about what the UK graduates did after leaving university in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The charts show the info about the use of the Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, consequently, however, if, so, then, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14054054054 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95974452533 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616216216216 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3631217945 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.857142857 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5714285714 5.23603664747 259% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216027440782 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980139856088 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939482024915 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154450707651 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350233572608 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.