The line chart compare the number of internet users in three different countries (The USA, Canada dan Mexico) between 1999 and 2009. Overall, it is apparent that the most significant number of internet user was in Canada, meanwhile the least was in Mexico.
In the initial year, just about 10% of Canadian had accessed to internet. In the following year (2001) the proportion of intenet users in Canada was two fold that of initial year and then, the figure significantly improved to about 60% in 2003. After that, the proportion of Canadian using internet increased sharply to about 80% in 2007 and in the final year it is shown that all of Canadian accessing internet. Conversely, The number of Americans using internet in 1999 was the lagest, and it doubled in the following two years. Between 2001 and 2005, the figure showed a significant raised to about 70%. From 2007 to 2007, the number of intenet users in the USA grew marginally and ending the period at just 80%.
In Mexico, in the beginning of the period, approximately 5% of Mexican used internet and the proportion of internet users in Mexico rose to about 10% next year, following by a steady increased between 2001 and 2005. The tren was continue for 2007 to 2009 and in the final year, it was reported that only 40% of Mexican accessed the internet.
- Scientists agree that many people are eating too much junk food and it is damaging their health Some people think that this problems can be solved by educating people to eat less junk food Other people believe that education will not work Discuss both opi 73
- For all children the ability to play a musical instrument is just as important as the ability to read and write To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Childcare training courses should be mandatory for all parents Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and include relevant examples 61
- The table below gives information about bakery s average sales in three different branches in 2015 67
- The diagram below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'continued'.
Suggestion: continued
...sed between 2001 and 2005. The tren was continue for 2007 to 2009 and in the final year,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7347826087 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50243359813 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45652173913 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2782024802 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266289179465 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123215885803 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113257777628 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230648076445 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11128225092 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'continued'.
Suggestion: continued
...sed between 2001 and 2005. The tren was continue for 2007 to 2009 and in the final year,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7347826087 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50243359813 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45652173913 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2782024802 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266289179465 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123215885803 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113257777628 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230648076445 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11128225092 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.