Some people believe that children should play outdoor games. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that children should engage in outdoor activities. while there are numerous benefits to this practice, I partly disagree with this notion due to the risk it presents
On the one hand, the option to let children play outdoor games is attractive for several reasons. The first reasons for this is children can develop their physical development. Outdoor games encourage physical activity, which is crucial for healthy growth and maintain a healthy weight. This is because when children play outside, they will absorb vitamin D from the sun for bone growth and bone regeneration. Moreover, playing outside activities helps children burn the energy and consume the leftover calories to keep in shape.
Another reason is playing outdoors allows children to interact with peers, building their circles of friends. This can be exemplified in the case of playing groups games. These games require cooperation, negotiation, and problem-solving skills, all of which contribute to a child's social development. Last but not least, children can relieve stress and improve their moods through outdoor games. This could be explained by the fact that spending time in nature to breath deeply will make them feel comfortable and refreshing after a tired day at school.
Nevertheless, there are a variety of reasons why I also believe that children should not be allowed to play outdoor recreational activities. Admittedly, falls, scrapes, bumps, and bruises are common occurrences during outdoor leisure activities. While these are usually minor, more serious injuries like broken bones or sprains can happen.
In conclusion, although letting children freely engage in outdoor games presents physical health benefits, I contend that it should not be encouraged due to the risk these games pose to children. It is advisable that parents take the appropriate measures to protect their offspring from the health hazard that outdoor activities present.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- Cinema attendance by age group 84
- The maps below show the planned to the town of Peterford in a 20 year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparions where revelant At least 150 words 80
- Some people believe that children should play outdoor games To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that children should play outdoor games To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...en should engage in outdoor activities. while there are numerous benefits to this pra...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oor recreational activities. Admittedly, falls, scrapes, bumps, and bruises are c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46204620462 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71318443906 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590759075908 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5146096334 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4375 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272800213933 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095211327858 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834847494375 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158898843262 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288530787545 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.