You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table below shows the number of temporary migrant worker in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1,000 people in these countries in 2006.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The given table illustrates the number of short-term migrant employer in four distinctive regions between 2003 and 2006 and corresponding worker-to--population ration in 2006.
Overview, most people from other continents had a tendency to migrate provisionally to the United States with the highest figure, as opposed to New Zealand which is the least-chosen countries for migrant. However, the ratio of these workers compared to the population of New Zealand was ranked as the leading position, while the figure for United States was the lowest.
In terms of the number of provisional migrant employers in the United States was recorded at 577,000 in 2003, which observed a minimal growth to 678,000 after 3 years. For the number of immigrant in United Kingdom, its figure witnessed a double growth in the period of 3 years, at 266,000. Turning to the amount of workers gone abroad to Australia and New Zealand was accounted for 152,000 and 65,000 and the figure of Australia in 2006 was approximately two times higher than the figure of New Zealand.
Concerning the ratio of these workers compared to the population of New Zealand in 2006, its figure was ranked in the leading position, at 21,1, followed by Australia with the figure being recorded at 10,7. The remaining figure for comparison between migrant workers and total population was recorded at lower data with 2,3 for the United States and 4,4 for the United Kingdom.
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The picture illustrates the disparity of a park named Grange Park between 1920 and today 67
- The charts below give information on the location and types of dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows the number of temporary migrant worker in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 Summarise the information by selecti 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12765957447 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85136867218 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476595744681 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.1113855937 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.625 112.824112599 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.375 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191554688892 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101524688197 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640489325245 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145841573606 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069855121486 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.