The first chart be;ow shows energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of energy cunsomption of Australian citizens in six various tools, while the second pie chart which is below the first shows the impact of energy use in produce of greenhouse gas.
It is obvious that heating has the majoritiy of portion use among people and the lowest percent related to cooling tools. In the second graph all groups for greenhouse gas emissions have increased except heating.
As can be seen, Australian household use heating energy more than other groups by 42%. Water heating by more than a qouarter located in the second place. Other appliances has less than twienty percent and other three remain groups are less than ten percent. Although heating has the hieghst percentage in using energy, it reduces around 27 precent to emission greenhouse gas that is a very useful energy for the environment and people should use this more than others. Other appliances has increased about 12% from 15 percent. Refrigeration by increasing 7% has approximately a same percent with heating but this energy can emission double gas when use and is danger. Water heating did not change a lot and two last groups not only do not change a lot but also their percentage are under ten percent yet.
As a result, the society of Australia have a good tendency to use heating energy which makes produce less gas and it is a good point for environment.
- The diagram below show how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The working week should be shorter and workers should have longer weekend Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable be shared freely Discuss both these views and give yo 56
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
- Some people believe that it is beast to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these view and give your own opinion 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, while, as a result, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86974789916 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54423821266 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521008403361 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9207778793 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.363636364 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272727721193 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104933423371 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978777387108 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182510715361 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941172585562 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, while, as a result, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86974789916 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54423821266 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521008403361 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9207778793 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.363636364 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272727721193 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104933423371 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978777387108 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182510715361 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0941172585562 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.